Event Results
Forge Fencing - Priority on Youth #4 of 5Difficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MING Emma | V V | V V | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 2 | WATSON Dylan | D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 3 | YEAZEL Colin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | CHOU Franklin | V | V D | 0.1 | 1 | +0.9 |
| 5 | MOORE Blaise | V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 6 | LEE Vera Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | KHOSLA Shya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | GOLDSTEIN Malcolm Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | SIROTA Simone Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | JOHNSON Marlee | D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
| 11 | GUO YUEXI Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | ELLINGTON Owen Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | YEAZEL Reid Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | HEUSER Erica Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | WOLFF Charles Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |