Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHEFFIELD Skye | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 2 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 3 | LEE Gloria Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 3 | WU Michelle | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 5 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 6 | QI Julieanne | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
| 7 | KUMAR Eva | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 8 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 9 | BRAVO ORTEGA Astrid | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
| 10 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 11 | LI Caroline | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 12 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 13 | HOAGLAND Sally | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 14 | PAN Angela | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 15 | WANG Cecilia | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | VOSKOV Olivia | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | KAUR Manroop | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 18 | GOH Cayla | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 19 | BISONO Valentina | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 20 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 21 | PAN Yiran | 3% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | KANG kailin | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | LIN Laura | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 24 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 25 | WONG Angelina | 6% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | JUN Bomie | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 27 | STOCKTON Catherine | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 28 | AGAON Evelyn | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
| 29 | FENG Iris | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 30 | ZHENG Erin | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | WANG Selina | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LI Yixin Catherine | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | LEE Claudia | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WROBEL Julia | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | HU Chloe | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | WU Madisen | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | ALVAREZ Martine | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | BI Michelle | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | SHABBIR Aiza | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | CHI Sarah | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LEUNG Sydney | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | MILLER Cassandra | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | BEJUGAMA Lasya | 61% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | DIBENEDETTI Isabella | 2% | 22% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.