Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
| 2 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 3 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 3 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 5 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 6 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 6% |
| 7 | SHENG Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 8 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
| 10 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 11 | YU Jane | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 13 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 14 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 15 | LI Katerina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | FIELD Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 19 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 20 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% |
| 21 | HARRIS Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% |
| 22 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 23 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
| 24 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 25 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
| 26 | JOO Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | 2% |
| 26 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 28 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 3% |
| 29 | LIU Yinuo | 100% | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 30 | BASILE Gianna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | SONG Jenna | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 33 | LI Han (Helina) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
| 34 | LIN Yunong | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | JIANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 36 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LIU Caydence | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | CAI Ilana | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 39 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 99% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | SHICK Veronika | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | POEI Lauren | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 42 | MCFARLANE Asha | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 43 | KIM Claire | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 44 | LI Savannah | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | TSE Isabel | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | REZA Fukaina | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | NETTLETON Ava | 100% | 59% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | CHOI Cara | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | PEVZNER Sophia | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | CAVANAGH Emma | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 100% | 97% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | WAN Celine | 100% | 70% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LAZAR Carolina | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | LEE Allison | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | OTTERMAN Jenna | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.