Collegiate Cup RJCC

Junior Men's Saber

Saturday, May 11, 2024 at 1:30 PM

Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 JOO Jeein 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 60%
2 ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 27% 5%
3 BARRETO Elliott 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 41%
3 PASTORE LIU Vince 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 73% 31%
5 ZUBATIY Samuel 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 36%
6 LEE Noah 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 9%
7 BYON Adrian 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 25% 4%
8 ROSBERG Dashiell W. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 56% 16%
9 YANG Ziyi 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 60%
10 BONIFIELD Arthur G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 47%
11 KIM ELIJAH 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
12 YANG Dylan 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
13 LIN Daniel 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 32%
14 YAN Kevin 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 25%
15 CHABENAT Guillaume 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 18%
16 LI Yiwei 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 16%
17 GAY Jono 100% 99% 85% 49% 14% 1%
18 TANI Tino 100% 100% 95% 73% 35% 7%
19 BYON Julian 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 21%
20 ZENG Vito 100% 91% 64% 29% 8% 1% -
21 KIM-COGAN Ryan 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 74% 31%
22 QIU Nathan 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 21%
23 CHEN Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 36% 5%
24 CHOW William T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 53% 10%
25 KROON Lucas 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
26 LI Ayden 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 6% -
27 HERRERA Aragon 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 22% 2%
28 SOWERS Samuel 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
29 KANG Evan 100% 100% 100% 94% 66% 17% 1%
30 NGO Maximus 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 17% 2%
31 VELAZQUEZ ORTIZ MATIAS 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 19%
32 YU Casey 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1% -
33 CONTRACTOR Cyrus 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 13% 1%
34 CAO Oliver 100% 98% 82% 48% 16% 3% -
35 SANCHEZ Jacob 100% 99% 94% 75% 40% 12% 1%
36 POLEYUMPTEWA Connor 100% 99% 89% 58% 20% 3% -
37 YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 13% 1%
38 SINGHAL Armaan 100% 91% 47% 11% 1% - -
39 HWANG Jayden 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 25%
40 TOLEDO Carlos Eduardo 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 12% 1%
41 TSE Aiden J 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 28% 5%
41 WONG Lucas 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 15% 2%
43 JOUFFLINEAU Yohann 100% 93% 66% 30% 7% 1% -
44 CHAN Henry 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 8% 1%
45 HOLZ Lucas 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 9% 1%
46 LEE Brian 100% 79% 37% 9% 1% - -
47 GREMILLION Obadiah 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 5% -
47 BUI Joseph 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% - -
49 WANG Tiger 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1% -
50 CHAN Aidan 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 8% 1%
51 ZHOU William 100% 98% 86% 53% 18% 3%
52 LI Yidong A. 100% 99% 89% 53% 13% 1% -
53 YANG Phillip 100% 99% 87% 56% 21% 4% -
54 KOVACHEV Martin 100% 89% 57% 22% 4% - -
55 VO Landon 100% 99% 82% 39% 7% - -
56 YU Kevin 100% 98% 86% 53% 18% 3% -
57 WONG Ron 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
58 WANG HongXi 100% 97% 75% 35% 8% 1%
59 HO Anson 100% 97% 74% 34% 7% 1%
60 RONG Jasper 100% 100% 76% 34% 8% 1% -
61 IYER Neil 100% 96% 75% 40% 12% 2% -
62 SLIGAR Jackson 100% 86% 48% 15% 2% - -
63 KANG Matthew 100% 99% 91% 66% 30% 7% 1%
64 BEKDJANOV Arthur 100% 73% 30% 7% 1% - -
65 HRISTOV Kris 100% 100% 84% 45% 13% 2% -
66 HENRY Ethan 100% 70% 26% 5% - - -
67 SU Kingston 100% 96% 74% 34% 8% 1% -
68 WONG David 100% 74% 30% 6% 1% -
69 VOSPER James 100% 40% 7% 1% - -
70 SEELMAN Cole 100% 84% 43% 11% 1% - -
70 LI Linze 100% 100% 95% 73% 36% 9% 1%
72 KROON Landon 100% 96% 74% 37% 11% 1% -
73 CHAN Elliott 100% 81% 42% 13% 2% - -
74 CHEN Cooper 100% 80% 37% 9% 1% - -
75 ASPIRAS Piers 100% 68% 24% 4% - - -
76 GU Kevin 100% 78% 36% 9% 1% - -
77 LEIGH Edward 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% -
78 LEE Brandon 100% 34% 4% - - - -
79 LIU Yijin 100% 83% 46% 15% 3% - -
79 SÁNCHEZ RODRÍGUEZ Ricardo 100% 90% 52% 18% 3% - -
81 LEE Nathan Uju 100% 91% 61% 25% 6% 1% -
82 BODMER Erik 100% 3% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.