Ataba Fencing Club - Hartland, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MCDOWELL Will | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
2 | WATTANAKIT Anda | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
3 | HEIM Bryce | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
3 | LEISECA Michael | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 35% |
5 | GINZBURG Adam | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 8% |
6 | CONKLIN Jim | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
7 | SWANSON Dave | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
8 | MILLER Joshua J. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
9 | MCCORD Jack | 1% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | < 1% | |
10 | SWENSON Nikita G. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
11 | SCHERG Caleb | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
12 | BERTRAND Reece | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
13 | RITTERBUSCH Timothy | 2% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
14 | AMICH Steve J. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
15 | BRAUN Chase | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
16 | KOSS Harrison | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | ALI Adam | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
18 | BURTON David | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
19 | ST. GEORGE David J. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | TIERNEY Luke | - | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
21 | HULL Ilsa | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
22 | BURKHARDT Krista L. | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
23 | RITTERBUSCH Abigail | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
24 | SWENSON Alexandra | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
25 | SCHERG Isaac | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
26 | MCGUIRE Colman | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | BONDELE jacob | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.