Purchase, NY - Purchase, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LILOV Neil | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 2 | KIM Minwook | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | YAO Jonathan | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | LIM Ryan Y. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | CHO Brandon | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | MAHONEY Colin M. | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 8 | LEMPERT Levy A. | V D D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 9 | LASORSA Matthew | D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 10 | TRUDNOS Allen | V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 11 | HO Kaden M. | V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 12 | RYAN Edward T. | D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 13 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | D D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 14 | MORRILL Justin | V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 15 | YANG Richard | D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 16 | HUANG Ian | V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 17 | HARRIS Alex K. | D V V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | METTKE Nathaniel | V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 19 | YOU Jaden | V D D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 20 | HUANG Tyler T. | D V V D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 21 | KEEFE Duncan | V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | ATEFI Daniel | D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 23 | MENSAH Kennedy C | V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | EDELMAN Seth A. | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | NOBLE Colin | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 26 | CHENG Kyle | D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | ZHOU Miles | V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | GOLD Jackson | D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 29 | MOULTON Ian | V D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 30 | KESSLER Josh | D D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 31 | OVERDECK Andrew | D D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 32 | ZHANG Jeffrey | D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 33 | HAN Daniel Y. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 34 | PILAT Matthew J. | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 35 | GEORGE Daniel | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 36 | KULKARNI Rohan | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.