Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 2 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 3 | HOAGLAND Sally | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 3 | SEREGIN Katya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 43% | 18% |
| 5 | MEYER Rebecca | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 6 | LEE Claire | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 7 | SHEFFIELD Skye | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 3% |
| 8 | BRUNSON Nile | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 9 | CHEN Alicia | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 10 | WANG Cecilia | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 12 | BRAGG Leah | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | GOH Cayla | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | QI Julieanne | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 24% |
| 15 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 16 | KANG kailin | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | PARSONS Mischa | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 18 | CHANG Chloe | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | GEFFNER Olivia | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | LIN Laura | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | KAUR Manroop | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 22 | MEYER Rachel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 24 | BI Michelle | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 25 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 26 | KRAJA Emma | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 27 | FENG Iris | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | LIN Victoria T. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | JUN Bomie | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | DAGLI Sai | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | BEJUGAMA Lasya | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | LI Yixin Catherine | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | WROBEL Julia | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | YANG Charlotte | - | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | LI Caroline | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 36 | SHABBIR Aiza | 25% | 52% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | YU Sara | 47% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | HO Gillian | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | MONITTO Malina | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | LEE Claudia | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | MILLER Cassandra | 17% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | TRIEU Autumn | 14% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.