Purchase, NY - Purchase, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 2 | HE Xiangxin | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 3 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 5 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 6 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 7 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 9 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 10 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 11 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 12 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | CHEN Jessie S. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 15 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 16 | DU Hannah | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | BOODELL Ella | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
| 18 | PATEL Anika | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 19 | LIN Ashley | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 20 | SHEN Annabel | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 22 | WU Irene M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 23 | BALCH Julia | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 24 | LEE Alison | 4% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | XIE zoey | - | 5% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 26 | SHEN Sophia | 1% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | YU Jaime L. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 29 | LI Rachel Y. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | FU Qihan | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | ZIMBALIST Lila | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | PO Edith | - | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 34 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 13% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | WELBER Maya | 26% | 49% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | NARDONE Anya | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 53% | 43% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.