Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Kevin | V V D D V V | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 2 | UEMOTO Ken | V V V D V | V V V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | LIN Philip T. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | SUGIURA Samuel | D V D V D | V V V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 5 | MCCARTHY Devan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | GONG zihao | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 7 | LAUB William | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 8 | SASSI Ilyas | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 9 | WANG Weiyun | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 10 | HOPPA Luke H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 10 | CLARK Gabriel | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 12 | SUBA Lucas | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 13 | MEI Yujie | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 14 | CHUNG Connor | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | LEE Andrew | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | LIU Isaak | D V V D D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | ZHAO Lucas | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 18 | PEREIRA Beckham | V V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 19 | SADHU Neiyam | V D V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 20 | PRIEUR Christian F. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 21 | ZHEXUAN yu | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | MARGULIS Jared | V V V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 23 | AO Christopher | V D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 24 | JONES Elijah | V V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 25 | SEN Christian | V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | BERA Enzo | D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | MEHAN Nicholas | V D D V V D | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 28 | CLARK Aram | V D V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 29 | FELDMAN Drew | V V D D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 30 | ALAVE Kyle | D D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 31 | NG Timothy | V D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 32 | HUANG Maxwell H. | V D D D D | V V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 33 | ATWOOD Griffin | V V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 34 | KIM Theodore | V V V V V D | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 35 | RYAN Kai | V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 36 | NGUYEN Anthony | V V D V D V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 37 | POWER Alex | V V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 38 | MANESCU Miron | D V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 39 | ROSADO Sebastian | D D V V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 40 | CUSUMANO Neal | D V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 41 | KOGAN Nikita | D V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 42 | FREDRICK Jameer | D V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 43 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | D V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 44 | SAGE Sebastian | D V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 45 | WANG Michael | D V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 46 | BODKIN Jake M. | D D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 47 | MCDONALD Finn | D D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 48 | WONG Caleb W. | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 49 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 50 | SUN Andrew | V D D D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 51 | TSAO Oliver | D D D D V V | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 52 | BAHK Caleb | D V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 53 | DESAUTELS Connor | D V D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 54 | PORTER Dupree | D D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 55 | BAI Evan | D V D D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 56 | ONG Dylan | D D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 56 | CHAKRAVORTY Sohan | V D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 58 | LIM Brandon | D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 59 | WASCO Andrew | D D D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 60 | LIGH Checed | V D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 61 | AHLMAN Jason | D D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 62 | ROBERTS Justin C. | D D D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 1 | -3.2 |
| 63 | WAGNER Calvin | D D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 64 | SCHIMEL Luke | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 65 | MAMKIN Nathan | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 66 | HOWARD Demani | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 67 | BERGER Jacob | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 68 | TSAO Alister | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 69 | JIANG Terence | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 70 | QUAIL Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 70 | JAIN Karanvir | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 70 | WANG tiger | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 73 | ORTHMANN Tristin | D D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
| 74 | GINGERY Julian | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.