Purchase, NY - Purchase, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
2 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
3 | WEBER Juliana I. | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 32% | 7% | |
3 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
5 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% |
6 | CHEN Erica | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
7 | LEVITIS Danielle | - | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
8 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
9 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
10 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
11 | KATZ Anat | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
12 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
13 | WU Cici | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
14 | LIU Rachel | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 20% | |
15 | NEIBART Fiona | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
16 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
17 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
18 | ZHANG Judy | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
19 | DARINGA Arianna | - | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
20 | TRIBUSH Shayna | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
21 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
22 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
23 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 11% | |
24 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
25 | KIM Catherine D. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
26 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% |
27 | LU Yi Lin | - | 7% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
28 | BAKER Audrey C. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
29 | MACKEY Deveraux S. | 4% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
30 | MAYS Hailey | 7% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
32 | BOURGEOIS audreane | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
33 | MEDVEDEVA Alexandra | 24% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
34 | ZENG Ruiqi | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
35 | PAONE Karina K. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
36 | LIN Selena | 6% | 39% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | |
37 | GIPSON Camille | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
38 | LAI Sophie M. | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
39 | LIGH Karis | 4% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
40 | CHO Adella | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
40 | LOCKETT Audrey | 15% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
42 | RODGERS Sally E. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
43 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 77% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | |
44 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
45 | FAUSTINO Emily | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.