Olympia Fencing Center Cambridge - Cambridge, MA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TANG Luke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | LI Nolan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | MURPHY CHANCOGNE Quentin | V V V | V | 0.4 | 3 | +2.6 |
| 3 | CHAN Seanan | V V V | V | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 5 | EFFEL Samuel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | LOGINOV Iurii | D V | V | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 7 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | V V D | V | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 8 | TAN Wyatt | D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 9 | SON Joshua | V V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 10 | AIN Alexander | V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 11 | YOON AAKERSTEN Albin | D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 12 | TANG Jake | D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 13 | HERIGSTAD Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | CHEN Bao Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | KOLIDAS Alexander | D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 16 | SHAHDA Hadi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | LI Sean | D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
| 18 | EICHELBERGER Luke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | MILOWSKY Majai Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.