Premier Fencing Academy - Sacramento, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | HOLZ William A. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
2 | HOLZ Daniel | - | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
3 | BAUER Hank E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
3 | POFF Kainoa | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
5 | AERY FALLICK Ozzie | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
6 | YANG Dylan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
7 | HOLZ Lucas | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
8 | CAISSE Simon B. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
9 | YANG Ziyi | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
10 | TSE Aiden J | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
11 | CHAN Henry | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
12 | LA MERS-NOBLE Kenneth | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
13 | VO Landon | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
14 | KANG Evan | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
15 | CRICOL Damian | 3% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
16 | WONG Lucas | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
17 | WONG David | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - | |
18 | HO Anson | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
19 | ASPIRAS Piers | 64% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
20 | HRISTOV Kris | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
21 | BEAM David E. | - | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
22 | LE Long | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.