Bay Regional Fencing Alliance - Freeland, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PHILPOT Eden E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 2 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 3 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 3 | SLUSHER Gideon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
| 5 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | |
| 6 | ATKINSON Josiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 7 | GREEN Zachary J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% | 4% |
| 8 | LEE Ian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 8% | |
| 9 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 10 | STONE Sydney | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 11 | BASS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 12 | EDWARDS Connor | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 13 | WILLIAMS Christopher R. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
| 14 | HARRIS Parker | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 15 | TAN Dorathy | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | OWENS Carrie M. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 32% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | DESAI Kanushi | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 18 | COLLINS Anna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 19 | TATE Liam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 20 | TATE Linus | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 21 | TAGORE Reyansh | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | ARNEMANN Jonas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
| 23 | STEMLER Tyler | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | BASS Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 25 | SOMERFORD Alex | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | MICK Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 27 | GIBSON Ammon | 100% | 99% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | SALINAS Sam | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | NANU Ava | 100% | 83% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | JACOBS Matthew | 100% | 82% | 36% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | MCCARTY Isaac | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 32 | KRAMER Sydney | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | PILON Isabella | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.