Denison University - Granville, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | MASON Alexander T. | - | - | - | 16% | 83% |
2 | CHAN Matthew | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 43% |
3 | KLINE R. Jay | 1% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 9% |
3 | IGNATIK Piotr | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
5 | HUNKER Frederick | 1% | 19% | 64% | 15% | - |
6 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | - | 2% | 23% | 65% | 10% |
7 | VERWORN Jonathan | 40% | 50% | 9% | - | - |
8 | HUGHES Evan | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
9 | APANASEWICZ Dan | 41% | 49% | 10% | - | - |
10 | ANDERSON Michael L. | 2% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 5% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.