Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CARTER Jane P. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 85% |
| 2 | CHAPMAN Lesley F. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 3 | CHOY Ida | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 3 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 5 | KERR Margaret E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 42% | 4% |
| 6 | GREENLEAF Amy Sue | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | - |
| 7 | HERMES Kathleen A. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 8 | DUSINLLEUX Kate D. | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 9 | BALDWIN Aimi | 11% | 43% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 10 | MANNING Lynne | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 11 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 12 | TASKER Monisha B. | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 13 | STEVENS Joanne B. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.