Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 19% | |
| 2 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 16% |
| 3 | FENG Ge | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 3 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | 13% | |
| 5 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 6 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 66% |
| 7 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 9 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 9% | |
| 10 | ZHOU Zhixiao | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 11 | LI Fei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 12 | HOAGLAND Sally | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | < 1% | ||
| 13 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 14 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
| 15 | DAVIS Jessica L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 16 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | 6% | |
| 17 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 59% | |
| 18 | WANG Trinity | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | CALDWELL Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 20 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 15% | |
| 21 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 23 | XIAO Nancy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% |
| 24 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 25 | WANG Sophie Y. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | GIELEGHEM Klaire | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | NGUYEN Celena | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | MONOVA Lilyana | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% | ||
| 30 | BI Michelle | 100% | 93% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | YU Eva | 100% | 91% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | PARSONS Mischa | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 34 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 35 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | LI Yixin Catherine | 100% | 84% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | BANNERMAN Courtney | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WANG Sabrina | 100% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 39 | BYK Laura | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | MARCHANT Morgan | 100% | 91% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
| 42 | LI Alice | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | PAN Angela | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | BALSKUS Sophia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 45 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 88% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | JONES Brenda L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | |
| 47 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 100% | 95% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 2% | - |
| 49 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 50 | BENNETT Olivia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 51 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | ||
| 52 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 53 | SIZER Courtney | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | CHOY Ida | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
| 56 | REISNER Gabriella | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | STAVISKY Natalia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 59 | GARLOCK Lilianne | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 60 | SONG Charlotte | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | STOCKTON Catherine | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 3% | |
| 63 | MILLER Cassandra | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 64 | DAGLI Sai | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | FOMINA Polina | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 66 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 67 | LIU Ilana | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 68 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.