Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAULSON Connor M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 2 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 45% |
| 3 | WALTER Evran M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 3 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 5 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
| 6 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 6% |
| 8 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 9 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | SURINGA William J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 11 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 12 | LI Bojun | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 13 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | ROSSEN Michael | 100% | 96% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 16 | GAO William | 100% | 96% | 66% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | ALONSOZANA Luke | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 19 | SZEGO Bence P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 7% |
| 21 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 25 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | WANG Waley | 100% | 93% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
| 28 | QIU Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | BEALE Asa G. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | BROWN Cullen | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | SCHLOSSNAGLE Christopher | 100% | 86% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | LI Lianhao | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ROSS III Paul D. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.