Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE kyungmin | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 2 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 3 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3 | PEELER Julia | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 20% | 3% | |
| 5 | REITINGER Emilie B. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 28% | |
| 6 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | - | 5% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
| 7 | LEE Yedda | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 12% | |
| 8 | CHENG Ava | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 9 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 10 | YOON Katherine | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 11 | LU Samantha R. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 12 | FLO Sena | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 13 | MCLAREN Rachel | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 14 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 15 | MACEDON Gianna | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 16 | HU Chelsea | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | CHAWLA Aanya | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 19 | CASPAR Margot | 15% | 51% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 20 | LIU Sydney | 1% | 16% | 51% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | LONG Madeline M. | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 24 | PEREZ Ariana | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.