Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE kyungmin | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
2 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
3 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% | |
3 | PEELER Julia | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 20% | 3% | |
5 | REITINGER Emilie B. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 28% | |
6 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | - | 5% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
7 | LEE Yedda | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 12% | |
8 | CHENG Ava | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
9 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
10 | YOON Katherine | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
11 | LU Samantha R. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
12 | FLO Sena | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
13 | MCLAREN Rachel | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
14 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
15 | MACEDON Gianna | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
16 | HU Chelsea | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
17 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
18 | CHAWLA Aanya | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
19 | CASPAR Margot | 15% | 51% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
20 | LIU Sydney | 1% | 16% | 51% | 26% | 5% | - | |
21 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
22 | LONG Madeline M. | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
23 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
24 | PEREZ Ariana | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.