Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
| 2 | CHENG Ava | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% | |
| 3 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 3 | HU Chelsea | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
| 5 | LEE Yedda | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 6 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 7 | PEELER Julia | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 9 | MACEDON Gianna | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 10 | YANG Alisa | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 11 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
| 12 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 13 | QIU Emily | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | CASPAR Margot | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 15 | YOU Emily | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | CHAWLA Aanya | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | RABASCO Lexi | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 18 | PEREZ Ariana | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 19 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 20 | JIANG Emily | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.