Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZAGUNIS Mariel L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 2 | RUSSO Francesca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 4% |
| 3 | AKSAMIT Monica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | STONE Anne-Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 5 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | 6% |
| 6 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 8% |
| 7 | TIMOFEYEV Daniella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 8 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 56% | 16% |
| 9 | JOHNSON Honor B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 10 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 5% |
| 11 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 12 | MERZA Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 13 | YUN Joy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 14 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 15 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 16 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 17 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 17 | JENKINS Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 19 | SHELTON Aleksandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
| 20 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | |
| 21 | MORALES Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 22 | MILLER Tiffany D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 1% |
| 23 | POWERS Skyla M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 24 | JENKINS Morgan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 25 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 26 | MERRIAM Martha H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 27 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 23% |
| 28 | TURNER Zoe Y. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 29 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 30 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 31 | FAHRI Monir J. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MERZA Celina | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 33 | BOITANO Christina R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 34 | O'BRIEN Regina R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 35 | MICHEL Violet N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
| 36 | HARRILL Gillian N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 37 | SHEA Erin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% | |
| 39 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | WITEK Sophie B. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | BURKE Nora S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 43 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 44 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 45 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 46 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 48 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% | |
| 50 | LI Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 51 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | |
| 52 | YUN Maya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 54 | DECKER Laura | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | NGUYEN Thea | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 56 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 57 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 58 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | SULLIVAN Caroline E. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | PINCUS Lucy Y. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 61 | SEHIC Cassandra | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
| 62 | PLUNKETT Kerry | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 63 | WOZNIAK Kelli | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 64 | GOMERMAN Ashley | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 65 | HINDS Eva R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 6% |
| 66 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 12% |
| 67 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 68 | CHAN Casey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 69 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 70 | YONG Annika A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 71 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 72 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 73 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 74 | WARD Reghan E. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 75 | CANSECO Laura K. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 76 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% | |
| 77 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 78 | BROWNE Alexis G. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 79 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 80 | LASOTA Marta | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | MENTZER Katherine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 82 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 82 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 84 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 85 | LIMB Madeline I. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 85 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 87 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 88 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 89 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 90 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 91 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 92 | HANADARI-LEVY Amit | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | |
| 93 | KOZAK Sonja A. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 94 | HILADO Sarah | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 95 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 96 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 97 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 98 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 99 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 100 | HUA Jacqueline (Jackie) J. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 101 | CURZON Madeline M. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 102 | YUCEL Emine I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 103 | BENTOLILA Esther | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 104 | WHITE Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 105 | BUCHMANN Vivien | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 106 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 107 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 108 | SWALLOW Abigail R. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 109 | ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | CHEN Erica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 111 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 112 | ZHUANG Zhesi (Jessica) | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 113 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 114 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 115 | SHVARTSMAN Rochelle | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 116 | DODRILL Brooke | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 117 | FLOREZ Melissa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 118 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 119 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 120 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 121 | MIN Isabella K. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | - | |
| 122 | HAN Jeanette X. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 123 | SONG Robyn | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 124 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 125 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 89% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 126 | BIENVENU Camille C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 127 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 128 | BECCHINA Bridget F. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 129 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 130 | HUNTER Nina B. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 131 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 132 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 133 | KALRA Siya L. | 100% | 79% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 134 | WALTER Zsofia R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 135 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 136 | WOLFSON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 137 | BAWA Sanya | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 138 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 139 | WANG Caroline Y. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 140 | WU Zoe | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 141 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 141 | BURCH Makana Y. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 143 | PIACENTINI Ava (Ava J) J. | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 144 | PINCUS Emma Y. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 144 | LIU Rachel | 100% | 85% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 146 | CHEEMA Sophia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 146 | TIBURCIO Diana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% | 2% |
| 148 | KIM Nam Heui | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 149 | STOODLEY Theresa R. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.