Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE kyungmin | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
| 2 | TONG Sarah Shen | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 3 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 3 | KOKES Ava | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 5 | LU Samantha R. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 6 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 7 | MING Cynthia | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 8 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 9 | REITINGER Emilie B. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 10 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 11 | FLO Sena | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 12 | HU Chelsea | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 13 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 3% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 14 | LEE Yedda | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 15 | OGAWA Kaylin | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 16 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 6% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 18 | CORDERO Allison | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 20 | PEREZ Ariana | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.