Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEONARD Cole | V V V D D V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 2 | BRAR Sanjeet | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | PAN Andrew W. | D D D D D V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 1 | -3.4 |
| 3 | REN Richard | D V V D D V | V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 5 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 7 | WOODWARD Connor | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 8 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | CHIN Matthew W. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | KOSURI Harsha | V D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 11 | CHEN Leo | D V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | WANG Charles | V D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | LEE Aydan J. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | ZHENG Edward L. | V V D V D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 15 | JOHNSON Langston C. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | HOLDEN Joseph | V V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | BANG Hyeonjin | V V V V V V | D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 18 | LU Caleb Q. | D V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 19 | ZHOU Brian | V V D V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | CHAVES Matthew J. | V V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | FORT David | V D D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | V D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | HYUNGJUN lee | V D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 24 | JOHNSTON Bennett S. | V V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | MENTA Varun | D D D V V V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 26 | COSGROVE Connor R. | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D D V V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | DESHETLER Scott | D D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 29 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | D V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | WANG Andrew | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | ZHU Charlie | D D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 32 | BAERMAN Michael | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 33 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 34 | CLARK Keagan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 35 | ZHANG Tianran | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.