Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LOPEZ Carlos D. | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
2 | HELTON Noah | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
3 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
3 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
5 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 33% |
6 | BUERGIN Aidan | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
7 | PAULSON Connor M. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
8 | YU Jonathan J. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
9 | TIAN Aaron C. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
10 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 12% |
11 | SMITH V Edward (Quin) A. | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 47% | 8% |
12 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 2% | - |
13 | GU Jeffrey | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
14 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
15 | WHITEHEAD Amir | 7% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
16 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
17 | ROSSEN Michael | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
18 | EVANS Aidan | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | - |
19 | MOHAMED Amir | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
20 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 1% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
21 | MOHAMED Murad | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
22 | ALONSOZANA Luke | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
23 | KIZHNER Fillip | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - |
24 | BEALE Asa G. | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
25 | WANG Waley | 17% | 48% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | LEE Jacob | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
27 | BROWN Cullen | 53% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
28 | LI Bojun | 23% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | TSIMMERMAN Michael | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
30 | ROSS III Paul D. | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.