Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 14% |
2 | CHO Sabrina N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
3 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
3 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% | |
5 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
6 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 20% | |
7 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
8 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
9 | YANG Emma | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | < 1% | |
10 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
11 | LUO Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 5% |
12 | ANDREYENKA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
13 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
14 | PAPP Jazmin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
15 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
16 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
17 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | |
18 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
18 | HAYES Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
20 | ANDREYENKA Yana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
21 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 16% |
22 | NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% |
23 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
24 | GU Maggie Runlin | 100% | 95% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
25 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | |
26 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 15% | |
27 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% |
28 | MI Aileen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
29 | LEUNG Mei Hang (Danise) | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
30 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
31 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
32 | YANG Audrey | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - | |
33 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | < 1% |
34 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
35 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | < 1% |
36 | YANG Iris | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
37 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
38 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
39 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
40 | LIN Zhi Tong | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
41 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
42 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% | |
43 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
44 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
45 | ADLER Polly Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
46 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 19% |
47 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 24% | |
48 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
49 | KOLLÁR Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% | |
50 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | |
51 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 38% | |
52 | TROXEL Sylvie A. | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
53 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% | |
54 | WANG SIQI | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
55 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
56 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
57 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
58 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
59 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
60 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
62 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
63 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
64 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
65 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 11% |
66 | ZHUANG Xinyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
67 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
68 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
69 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
70 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
71 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
72 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
73 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
74 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
75 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
76 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - |
77 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
78 | LEE Jiahn (Lana) | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
79 | GLASSON Sophia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
80 | POLONYI Petra Dóra | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
81 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
82 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 10% | |
83 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
84 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
85 | WANG YiXi | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
86 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
87 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
88 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
89 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
90 | BABIAC Julia | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
91 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
92 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
93 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 2% | |
94 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
95 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
96 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
96 | AMORE Victoria | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
98 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
99 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
100 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
101 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
102 | REN Kayley | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
103 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
104 | YU Jane | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
105 | PAULUS Sloane E. | 100% | 78% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
106 | OH Ceana | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
107 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
108 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
109 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
109 | HU Felice | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
111 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
112 | XIE Lillian | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
113 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
114 | SUN Emily | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
115 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
116 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
117 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
118 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
119 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
120 | LI Shuang | 100% | 91% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
121 | YAO Ada | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
122 | KO Claire | 100% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
123 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
124 | STRUGAR Steliana | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
125 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.