National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Div I-A Women's Épée

Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KORFONTA Jolie V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.8 6 +1.2
2 BUECHEL Holly M. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
3 SEBASTIAN Felicity A. V V D V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
3 WATTANAKIT Anda V D V V V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
5 HAFEEZ Hiba V V V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
6 PADHYE Tanishka V V D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
7 YANG Alisa V D V D V V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
8 WELLS Tesla M. V V D D V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
9 ZANGA Kaitlyn V V D V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
10 SWENSON Nikita G. V V V D V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
11 SMUK Alexandra S. V V V D V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
12 FURMAN Maria V V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
13 CHI Chelsea V V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
14 ANDERSON Claire V V D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
15 DALEY Keira V V D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
16 PEHLIVANI Zara V D V V V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
17 MUELLER Emma M. V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
17 LEE Natasha V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
19 SPRINGER Sierra V V V V D V V D 5.0 5 -
20 PROKOP Jeannine A. V D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
21 LIN Elaine V V V V D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
22 SHU Youshan D V V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
23 KUNJAN Lena R. V D D V V V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
24 SMUK Daria A. D V V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
25 WANG Zoe V D V D V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
26 DESAI Meera P. V D V V D D V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
27 ZHU Serene M. V V D D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
28 PECK Maia A. D D V V V D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
29 YOU Emily V V V D D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
30 NELSON-LOVE Lily B. D D D D V V V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
31 ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika D V D D V D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
32 VASYAKIN Liana V D D V D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
33 KIM Jayna V V V V V V D 2.9 6 +3.1
34 ROVATI Caterina V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
35 BASRALIAN Azniv V D V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
36 FLITMAN Gabrielle V V V D V V D 1.0 5 +4.0
37 FENG Ge V V V V D V D 4.4 5 +0.6
38 WITTER Catherine A. D V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
39 HANSEN Kira V V V V D D 4.2 4 -0.2
40 WANG Trinity V V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
41 HEPLER Sarah V V D V D V V D 4.0 4 -
42 KUMAR Anusha D V V D V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
43 SEREGIN Katya V V V V D D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
44 RICHARDSON Meredith D V D V V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
45 MONTOYA Kimberlee C. D V V V V D V D 4.6 4 -0.6
46 HAFEEZ Hania V V V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
47 XU Celina D D V V V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
48 ZMURK Emma M. D D V V D V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
49 ZHU Riley D D D V V V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
50 CHEN Alicia V D D V V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
51 ZHAO Alina V D V V D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
52 GUJJA Misha D D V V V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
52 WANG Victoria V D D V D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
54 XIONG Angelica V D V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
55 CHANG Celine A. V D D V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
56 QIU Emily V V D D V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
57 BEAVER Hannah D D V V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
58 CANNING Charlotte D D D V D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
59 BALAKRISHNAN Trisha D D V D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
60 WANG Sophie Y. D V D D V D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
61 FOELLMER Kristin D V D V D D V D 5.4 2 -3.4
62 MYRAH Vivienne V D D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
63 CHERNIS Zoe C. D D V D D V D 2.8 1 -1.8
64 NGUYEN Audrey D D D D V V D 2.4 1 -1.4
65 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. V V D V D V D 4.4 4 -0.4
66 MALLAVARPU saanvi V V V V D D D 3.4 4 +0.6
67 KAUR Manroop V V V D D V D 1.4 4 +2.6
68 DUNSEATH Lauren M. V D D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
69 LAN Alice S. V V V D D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
70 PINNAMANENI Drithi D V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
71 PULLEN Ayah V V V D V D D 2.6 4 +1.4
72 CAMPBELL Anahit M. V D V V V D D 3.3 4 +0.7
73 KANESHIGE Christina Y. V V V D D D 4.0 3 -1.0
74 PRIHODKO Nina D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
75 SYKES Elynor V V V D D D 2.0 3 +1.0
76 MANDAP Svetlanna V V D V D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
77 WANG Ziqiao (Claire) V V V D D D D 2.4 3 +0.6
78 SALISTRA Emilia D V V D D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
79 WANG Angelina D V V V D D D 3.0 3 -
80 CHANG Chloe D V V V D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
81 ETZEL Rowan D V D D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
81 PULLARA Ashley V D D D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
83 KALGAONKAR Arohi V V D V D D D 1.2 3 +1.8
84 SHARMA Sanvi D V D V V D D 1.9 3 +1.1
85 SENYUVA Su V V V D D D D 2.7 3 +0.3
86 ENRILE Erica D V V D D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
87 SCHULTZ Nomi D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
88 FERNLUND Helen V D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
89 MCSWEENEY Janie D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
90 LIN Victoria T. D D D V V D 1.0 2 +1.0
91 SAVNER Jessica L. D V V D D D D 3.9 2 -1.9
92 LIANG Jingjing D V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
93 GORDON Rachel A. D D V D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
93 PANT Anisha D D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
95 KUKVA Taisiya D D D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
96 HUANG Lanlan D V D D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
97 KENT Elizabeth J. V D V D D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
98 LAI Amanda D D D D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
99 HILBY Olivia D D D V V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
100 LI Fei D D V D D 2.7 1 -1.7
101 CAREY Michele S. D D V D D 2.8 1 -1.8
102 NELSON Grace E. V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
103 CAPELLUA Mariasole D D V D D D 3.8 1 -2.8
103 NOVOJILOV Anastasia D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
105 MARTYNOVA Diana D D D D D V 2.8 1 -1.8
106 BROWN Amanda D D D D V D 3.5 1 -2.5
107 LANE Leah D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
108 FREEMAN Kit D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
109 SHELIN Chelsea D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
110 REYNOLDS Elly D D D D D V 0.8 1 +0.2
111 PAN Angela D D D D D V 1.1 1 -0.1
112 WOLF Lisa A. D D D D D V 3.1 1 -2.1
113 DONGES Anna D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
114 MISHIMA Audrey D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
115 GUSKA Jenn D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
116 WEI Sherry D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
117 RASMUSSEN Ashelee D D D D D D 3.1 0 -3.1
118 BOWIE Charlotta D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
119 CHENG Wanrong D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
120 JAMES Ashley D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
121 LORENTSON Dawn M. D D D D D D 2.8 0 -2.8
122 MCKENNA Analise D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.