International - Troy, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1 | SHMULER Fiona | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 2 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 18% | 45% | 31% | 6% | |
| 3 | ZHU Alina | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
| 5 | LEIGH Adalene | 5% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 3% |
| 6 | MAK Kaitlin | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 39% |
| 7 | NEDOPAKA Kateryna | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
| 8 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 2% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 7% |
| 9 | MAGITSKY Leila | 6% | 31% | 45% | 17% | |
| 10 | FIGELMAN Maya | 7% | 34% | 43% | 15% | 1% |
| 11 | GRIMPAVIOTI Eleonora | 13% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | RIFKIN Lielle | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 13 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 35% | 45% | 18% | 2% | |
| 14 | ASIMAKOPOULOU Filomila | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 15 | LOZIER Camryn | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.