YEL Fencing Club - Hopkins, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SEZER Kaya | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
2 | SINHA Verdhaan | - | - | - | - | - | 6% | 94% |
3 | WILKINS Mateo | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
3 | TAN Xinlai | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 15% |
5 | SHELTON Olivia | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
6 | KANG Marian | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
7 | TOEWS Jackson | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
8 | WAKEHAM Paul | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
9 | FLANAGAN James | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
10 | GLOVER George | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
11 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
12 | SETHRE Traci | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 38% | 11% | - |
13 | FEEHAN Conor | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
14 | WAKEHAM Timothy | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
15 | NEELIMANDHU Sahil | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | - |
16 | WOJTALEWICZ Aiden | 9% | 40% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
17 | ZINSER Jamie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
18 | DIFRANK Michael | 27% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
19 | SHUSTA Lily | 3% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
20 | RUBY Asher | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | - |
21 | KRONZER Sophia | 10% | 42% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
22 | IBARRA Alejandro | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
23 | PERLENFEIN Tyler | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
24 | LEGGETT Emilia | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
25 | NELSON Noah | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | - |
26 | CRUZ Cole | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
27 | GORDON Jack | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
28 | NEPAL Noukou Asha | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.