NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
2 | WANG William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | |
3 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
3 | FALCON-KORB Mathis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% |
5 | WANG ANDREW CHANG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% |
6 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
7 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% | |
8 | GONG Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
9 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
10 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
11 | WANG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 25% | |
12 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | |
13 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
14 | WU Timothy | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
15 | LIU Isaak | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
16 | CIEMINS Henry | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
17 | WOLMART Zander | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | |
18 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | |
19 | RAMIREZ Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
20 | ZHOU Grant | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
21 | WANG Michael | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
22 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
23 | SUN Andy | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
24 | KALOUDIS Sean | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
25 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | LEHMAN Matthew | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | AMAGOWNI Dhruv | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
28 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
29 | SHAH Sohan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
30 | LASKOW Oliver | 100% | 94% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
31 | DEMERS Bodhi | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
32 | YANG Byron | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% | - | |
33 | KHOJASTEPOUR Kian | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
34 | AHLMAN Jason | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | LAZARTE Gabriel | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
36 | MATTINGLY Ian | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
37 | HOWE Brandon | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
38 | VISH Manyu | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.