Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 2 | OLELE Ifechi | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 3 | CHI Zoe | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | SONG Sunny | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 5 | MOHAN Riya | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 6 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 7 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Renee | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 9 | WU Jessica | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 10 | XU Jessica | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 11 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 12 | WANG Chantal | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 13 | LIN Isabel | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 14 | ZHAO Yanning | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 15 | XU Chenyu | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 16 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | SUN Karolyn | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | CHOI Lydia | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | KUTSY Olga | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
| 20 | MAENG Gloria | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 21 | KOU Cynthia | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 2% |
| 22 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 23 | CHANG Allison | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | JU Jennifer | 4% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 25 | LI Anna | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | YOUN Kylie | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | AL-BATTAINEH Hana | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 28 | WANG Olivia | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LI Chloe | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | YU Chloe | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HAN Sydney | 3% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHEN Julia Z. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 33 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LI Carlie | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BERESTOVITSKY Eva | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | GARCIA Sophia Noelle | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ARNOLD Evangeline | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 38 | XIONG Alice | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | YIP Allison | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | HALLENBECK Felicity | 12% | 32% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WANG Ailly | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | SRIVASTAVA Aria | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.