Forge Fencing Academy & Club - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
2 | CHEN Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
3 | LANG Markus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
3 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
5 | HENDERSON Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
6 | HAN Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
7 | BROWN Joshua (Josh) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
8 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 3% | |
9 | FACCI Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 27% |
10 | WEIKEL Joel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
11 | DONNELLY Enzo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 5% | - |
12 | DAVIS Andrew | 100% | 97% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
13 | KARNAVAS William | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 2% | |
14 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
15 | LU James | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
16 | CRAWFORD Charles (Marston) M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
17 | RICKMAN Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
18 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
19 | ANDERSON Derek M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
20 | UNZHAKOV Konstantin | 100% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
21 | SMITH Herman E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 34% | 4% |
22 | ZHU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | 1% |
23 | AMOROSO John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
24 | BLONDEL Leo O. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
25 | WHITE Taylor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 3% | |
26 | NOLAN Tyler | 100% | 87% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
27 | RUSSELL Tallis | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
28 | GARMON Brian | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
29 | JONES Jackson | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | IBRAHIM Layla | 100% | 94% | 59% | 17% | 1% | - | - |
31 | WANG Andy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
32 | PRABHU Srinish | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
33 | HARRIS Lynn B. | 100% | 87% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
34 | CARCATERRA Theodore | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
35 | AZAD Ava | 100% | 96% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
36 | LANIER Cody | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | PERI Mourya | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
38 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
39 | BALAGUERO Alina | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
40 | GARMON Alex (Lilly) | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.