Danvers Indoor Sports - Danvers, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WU Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | LI Richard | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 3 | TAN Aidan | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 3 | YAO Bradley | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | LI Bradley | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 6 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | POLONI Giovanni | D V V D V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 8 | SHAO Eric | D D V D D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 9 | GE Daniel | V V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 10 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | D V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 10 | FENG Michael | V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 12 | WANG Rory | V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 13 | LI Eric | V D D D V V | V D | 5.4 | 3 | -2.4 |
| 14 | DAVIDSON Elliot | V V D D V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 15 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D D V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 16 | TIBBETTS Justin | D D D V V D | V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | LU Jingyi | V V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 18 | TANG Albert | V V V V V D | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 19 | CHENG Ethan | V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | SUN Ryan | V D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 21 | ANDERSON Jacob | V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 22 | LIU Derek | D D V V V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 23 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | D V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 24 | SURESH Rohan | D V V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 25 | XIE Buster | D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | SFINTESCU Alex | V D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 27 | CAO Justin | V V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 28 | ZHAO Brian | V D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | WONG Jacob W. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 30 | JIN Andy | D D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 31 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | V D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | D D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | STAFFORD Gareth | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 34 | SENANI arjun | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 35 | LAI Aaron | D D D D D V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 36 | ARRISON Alex C. | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 37 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 38 | MCENTEE Owen | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 39 | PETINO Leonardo | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 40 | BERETICH Brian | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.