Danvers Indoor Sports - Danvers, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Adam | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | TESFAYE Elias | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 3 | SONG Aidan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | HENNESSY Levon | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 5 | TRAN Spencer | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | KABA Elias | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | SINGLETON Aman | D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 8 | GU Eric | D V V D V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 9 | KIM Remington | V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 10 | LEE Harrison | V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 11 | CAFASSO Alexander | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | SZCZAPA Lukas | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | HELMY Richard | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | ARMSTRONG Payson | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 15 | ZHANG Jonathan | V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | WANG-SONG Evan | D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | BO Genero | D V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 18 | MASSE Dean | V D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 19 | MANSFIELD Hunter | D D V V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 20 | MOZZER Nolan | V D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | WITHERELL Logan | D D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | CHEN Evan | V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 23 | HANNA Alexander | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | CHEN Daniel | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | AU Joshua | D V D V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 26 | ZHENG Jason | V D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 27 | SHAO Mason | D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | PARIGIAN Alexander | V D D D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 29 | CHEN Tianjun | V V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | ROBINSON Garrett | D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 31 | CHEN Cameron | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | HOLCOMB Liam | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | DAI Jason | D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | SHI Evan | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 35 | GILLARD Adan | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 36 | YOON Jonathan | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 37 | MANUEL Eli | D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 38 | CIANCHETTA David | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | WILLIAMS Gavin | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 40 | LAZORISAK Andrew | V D D D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 41 | WU Matthew | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 42 | BRESLAV Asher | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 43 | HUFF Alexander | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.