Brockport, NY - Brockport, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 2 | HILD Nisha | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | CHIANG Emily | - | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 3 | LU Elaine | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 5 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 6 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 7 | PASHIN Anna | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 8 | CHEN Celina Z. | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 9 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 10 | JAVERI Amaya | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 11 | YU Melinda | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 12 | HUANG Caroline | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 13 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 14 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | LAU Dara L. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 16 | SADOVA Olga | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 17 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 17 | SHIH Christina | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 19 | YUN Emma | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | MU Vicki Y. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 21 | KIM Marley I. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | MCKEE Ainsley | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 34% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | LITVAK-HINENZON Michaela | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.