Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
2 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | |
3 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
3 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
5 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
6 | BYON Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
7 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% | |
8 | GAY Jono | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
9 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
10 | CHON Collin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
11 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
12 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
13 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
14 | LESUEUR Luke J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
15 | NGO Maximus | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
16 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
17 | SANCHEZ Jacob | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
18 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
19 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
20 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
21 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
22 | TOLEDO Carlos | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
23 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
24 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
25 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
26 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | |
27 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
28 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
29 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
30 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
31 | SU Kingston | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
32 | LISKOVETS Alec | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
33 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
34 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
35 | HO Anson | 100% | 99% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
36 | VO Landon | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
37 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
38 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
39 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
40 | SEELMAN Cole | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
41 | SINGHAL Armaan | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
42 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
43 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
44 | WONG David | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
45 | FOX Gavin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
45 | LEE Brandon | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
47 | CAO Donald | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
48 | BULLARD Bennett | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
49 | SUNG Julian | 100% | 88% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
50 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 6% |
51 | SUN Andy | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
52 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
53 | COBIAN Richard | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
54 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
54 | DE WITT Magnus | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
56 | GARDNER David | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
57 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
58 | CHEN Yuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% |
59 | BUI Joseph | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
60 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | LEE Brian | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
62 | HSIEH Christian | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
63 | STONE Brad | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.