Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
2 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% |
3 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 77% | |
3 | HO Addison | - | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
5 | SUN Chloe | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
6 | ZHANG Eunice | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 44% | 16% |
7 | DENG Melissa | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
8 | KO Claire | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
9 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
10 | ZOU Ella | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 43% | 12% |
11 | REN Kayley | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 45% | 7% | |
12 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% |
13 | PENG Charlotte | - | 1% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
14 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
15 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 49% | 21% |
16 | LIU Ariana | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
17 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
18 | OH Ceana | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
19 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
20 | LENK Sophie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
21 | SUN Emily | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
22 | MU Allison | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
23 | GUAN Adeline | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
24 | THERON Zoe | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
25 | KIM Sydney | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
26 | ZHANG Ivy | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% |
27 | LEE Allison | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
28 | CHUN Adelle Ha-Eune | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
29 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | - |
30 | DO Leila | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 38% | 8% |
31 | BAE Yooju | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 3% |
32 | CHOI Kailyn | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
33 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
34 | XIE Su | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
35 | LIU Samantha | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
36 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
37 | LI Alice | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
38 | RAO Sonia D. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
39 | YONG Rosalind | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
40 | MONAT Jennifer | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
41 | PENG Serena | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
42 | VILLARAMA Kara | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
43 | TAYLOR Gabrielle | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
44 | WU Nicole Moxuan | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
45 | ANDONIAN Lauren | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
46 | WANG Celine S. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
47 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
48 | HUGHES Olivia | 14% | 55% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
48 | SAH Madeleine | 7% | 38% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
50 | ZONG Melody | 2% | 21% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 11% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
52 | FAN Lydia | - | 3% | 28% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - |
53 | DESAI Esha | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
54 | MORALES Paulina | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
55 | CAMPOS Camila | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
56 | WYNN Kylie | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
57 | SHUM Maya | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
58 | LAY Apollonia | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
59 | CUI alivia | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
60 | FANG Kelervia | 24% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
61 | DING Madison | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
62 | HOBSON Ava | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% |
63 | TAO Ann | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
64 | JACOB Norah | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
65 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
66 | GOEL Riyana | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | - | - |
67 | CHO Karis | 21% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
68 | IDANAWANG Madison | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
69 | LEUNG Lokhei (Hailey) | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
70 | TAN Shouyin | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
71 | CHANG Janelle | 9% | 43% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
72 | SINGH Sania | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
73 | XI Sophia | 20% | 66% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
74 | CADENA Anneli | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
75 | LIN Allison | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
76 | KIM Lauren | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
77 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 3% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
78 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 17% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
79 | NORRIS Erin | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
80 | IDANAWANG Allison | 73% | 26% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
81 | CANTON Sara | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.