Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 2 | DAVIS Jayna M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 3 | MUNGUIA Mila | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 3 | XIONG Haojiao | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 5 | TAN Adelyn | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 7% |
| 6 | YANG Lea | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 7 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 8 | GOLOVITSER Maya | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
| 9 | YAO Rainie | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 1% |
| 10 | KANG Ellie | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 11 | MANN Sophia J. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 12 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 13 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% |
| 14 | LEE Lauren | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | GAY Sasha | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 16 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 17 | LO Chloe | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | HU Michelle | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 19 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 20 | HAN Emma | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | SHEARER Alena | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | DUDNICK Morgan | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 23 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | LOMOTAN Addison | 1% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | KIM Satie | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | YAM Danika | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 2% |
| 27 | MATSUO Kei | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 28 | CHEN Elaine | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
| 29 | NING Lynn | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | OCA Merci | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LIU Hannah | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 32 | SCHOEW Margot | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WONG Natalie | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | TURIANO Nadelle | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 36 | STONE Coral | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | ARNOLD Hali | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 38 | FENG Alicia G. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 38 | OLKO Sophie | 15% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 41 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 1% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | HWANG Charlotte | 34% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | YUEN Nicole | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 44 | CAO arissa | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | SEAL Cameron I. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHAI AMY | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | KIRBY Skye | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LIU kai yin aria | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | BORTAI Eliza | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | ASPIRAS Avery | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | SAMPATH Medha | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MACARR Madalyn A. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 53 | TONG Laurie | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | GUTIERREZ Adylia-Rhenee | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | BHAVSAR Vanmayi | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.