Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 2 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
| 3 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 3 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 5 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 6 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 7 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 8 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 9 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 10 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 10 | YU Casey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
| 13 | PANG Hi Yui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 14 | NGO Maximus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
| 15 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 16 | SUNG Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 17 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% |
| 17 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 19 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 21 | LUC Linkin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 22 | SANCHEZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 13% |
| 23 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 23 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 25 | WONG David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | YU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 29 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 30 | KROON Landon | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | CHI Everett | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | GU Kevin | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | IM Tyler | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 5% | |
| 34 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
| 35 | KOZLOFF Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | IYER Neil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 37 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 39 | CAO Donald | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 40 | LISKOVETS Alec | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | BROWN Andrew | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | TAN Ryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 44 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | HO Anson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 9% |
| 46 | WINTERSET Mason | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 47 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 48 | SUN Andy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 50 | SEELMAN Cole | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 52 | HONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 52 | HENRY Ethan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 55 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 56 | VOSPER James | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | SU Kingston | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 58 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 59 | COBIAN Richard | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
| 60 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 61 | BRUM Charles E. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 62 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | SINGHAL Armaan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 64 | NGO Emerson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 65 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 66 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 67 | VAN ROY Ray | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 68 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 69 | IRVINE Patrick | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | TIAN Zimo | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 71 | YANG Jake | 100% | 78% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | HONG Arick | 100% | 92% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | PHAN Joshua | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | WESTMORELAND-BROWN Cole | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | LIANG Preston | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 76 | HUTSLAR Isaac | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | FUGATE Logan | 100% | 88% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | SINGH Swaran | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 79 | VO Landon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 79 | HERRERA Stefano | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | SUN Eon | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | LIAO Yifong | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 83 | NIKOLOV Ruben | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 84 | AMEN Oscar | 100% | 91% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | NGUYEN Dylan | 100% | 89% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | ZHENIROVSKYY Oleksandr | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 87 | ELSAYED Yahia | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | MUTYALA Kavin | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | XU Ethan | 100% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | YU Joshua | 100% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.