Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 2 | SLAVNOV Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 3 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 3 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 5 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% |
| 5 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 7% |
| 7 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
| 8 | LIU Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 4% |
| 9 | OU Rigel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 6% |
| 10 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
| 11 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | KAMURA Kosei | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 16 | BROOKS Isaac | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | LYU Tyler | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | KIM Suin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 19 | KAUL Ishaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 20 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 21 | SHANKAR Rahm | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | < 1% | - | |
| 22 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% | |
| 23 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
| 24 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 25 | SALMAN Ibrahim | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | SUN Stephen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 27 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 28 | BROOKS Theo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | LUO Gavin | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | STOLCKE Julian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 31 | LU Simon | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | CHEN Harrison | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SUN Leonard | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | THOTAKURA Sreyas | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SABINO Bennett | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | KORIVI Ishan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 36 | SCOTT Clark | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | PARK Seojun | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | LAN Jasper | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LI Jason | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Caleb | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SHARMA Ayaan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | HUANG Joshua | 100% | 98% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | WANG James | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | OH Caleb | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 46 | GUO Aiden | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | WOLLOW Bennett | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | KIM Eric | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 49 | YU Huibin | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 50 | JAIN Aarambh | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | LIU Dylan | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | BALAGOPAL Aditya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 53 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 55 | CAI Limo | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 56 | MAI Ryan | 100% | 92% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | CHIDAMBARAM Nivedh | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | YU Sean | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 59 | CAO Osmond | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.