Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
| 2 | JIANG Evelyn | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 3 | YAM Danika | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 15% |
| 3 | WANG Jiayi | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 5 | LIU Sydney | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
| 6 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
| 7 | LOMOTAN Addison | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 8 | CHEN Elaine | - | 3% | 12% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 5% |
| 9 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 10 | SUNG Isabella | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | YUEN Nicole | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
| 12 | TURIANO Nadelle | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 13 | TONG Laurie | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 14 | MISHEV Lila | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 15 | NING Lynn | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | OCA Merci | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | TAN Adelyn | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 18 | DANG Kelia | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 19 | LIAO Jieni | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | CONG Anne | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
| 21 | ARNOLD Hali | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 33% | |
| 22 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | LIU kai yin aria | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 25 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 26 | ZHAI AMY | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 27 | LIN Elaine | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 28 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 29 | KIM Saeren | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | WONG Natalie | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 31 | LONG Jessie | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | LONG Chloe | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 33 | STONE Coral | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 34 | LIN Abbey | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WONG Cerise | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | CHANG Annette | 7% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | MUNGUIA Mila | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 38 | BAIRD Kaleah | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | ZHAO Abbie | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 40 | CAO arissa | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HSIEH Lucia | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | BORTAI Eliza | 1% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 43 | LIU Hannah | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | KIM Satie | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | KIM Alexia | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 47 | HWANG Charlotte | 4% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | CAI Veronica | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | LIN Ariel | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | TEYSSIER Katherine | - | 2% | 11% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 51 | BORDAS HILL Georgiana | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 52 | YU Stella | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 53 | SAMPATH Medha | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | HAN Emma | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 55 | YU Skylar | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | WU Chloe | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | ASPIRAS Avery | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | MORALES Camila Avisac | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
| 59 | WU Daisy | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 60 | DING Jolie | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | KIM Alice | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 62 | JUNG Sienna | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | KIRBY Skye | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 64 | STAPLEY Claire | 32% | 45% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 65 | PANCHAL Arya | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | BHAVSAR Vanmayi | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.