NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
2 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
3 | AZMEH Nour | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% | |
3 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
5 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
6 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
7 | PAN Angela | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
8 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% | 3% | |
9 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
10 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
10 | FENG Ge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
12 | XU Serena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 10% | |
13 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 7% |
14 | FOMINA Polina | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
15 | PETROFF Eva | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
16 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
17 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 29% | |
18 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 3% |
19 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 9% |
20 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% | 1% | |
21 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 14% |
22 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
23 | WANG Hannah | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
24 | CHEN Alicia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
25 | MEYER Rachel | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
26 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% | |
27 | FANG Kayla | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
28 | MONOVA Lilyana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% | |
29 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 8% | - | |
30 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | WONG Angelina | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | GAVILANES Madyson | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
33 | LI Yixin Catherine | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
34 | BI Michelle | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
35 | TIBBETTS Lily | 100% | 93% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
36 | QUADRI Saira | 100% | 94% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
37 | LOBANOVA Varvara | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
38 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
39 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | |
40 | YU Eva | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
41 | PARSONS Leada | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - |
42 | HOAGLAND Sally | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
43 | SHEIKH PAREE | 100% | 88% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
44 | NGUYEN Celena | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
45 | GARLOCK Lilianne | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | GEFFNER Olivia | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
47 | FENG Iris | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
48 | BARMAN Willa | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
49 | STOCKTON Catherine | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
50 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
50 | MEYER Rebecca | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
52 | KWON Elise | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
53 | SHABBIR Aiza | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | LIU Ilana | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
55 | BASU Avneeta | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
56 | TORRES AGUILERA Mika | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
57 | LIN Cynthia | 100% | 79% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
58 | ADAMS Agatha | 100% | 77% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
59 | SONG Charlotte | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.