NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PINTO Marcus | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
2 | BERKOWITZ Gavin | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
3 | CLARK Aram | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
3 | WONG Max | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
5 | JI Johnson | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
6 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
7 | CHAMBERS Miles | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
8 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
9 | HU Jayden | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
10 | GORDON Samuel | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 2% |
11 | LIU Ryan | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
12 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 9% |
13 | LIU Eric | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
14 | KARAVAS Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
15 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
16 | SAYAR Luke | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
17 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
18 | MATTOO Dhruv | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
19 | LEE Damian | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
20 | KOREN George | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
21 | LIN Brendan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
22 | LIANG Morgan | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
23 | SONG Aidan | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
24 | QASBA Rudrh | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
25 | AVERY Marcus | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
26 | LUAN Stephen | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
27 | MHLEY Gavin | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
28 | LORENZ Evan | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
29 | RIVERATAN Darshan | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
30 | MELE Gianni | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
31 | SHAPIRO Leo | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
32 | WANG Theodore | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
33 | TITOV Zachary | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
34 | ZWAKA Jonas | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
35 | SUH Leo | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
36 | EARLEY Jack | 4% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | CHEN Brian | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
38 | CHAN Ewan | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
39 | HATCH Oliver | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
40 | CONG Mason | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
41 | LIEU Nicholas | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
42 | CUSSON William | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
43 | LAU Kyrus | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
44 | BENNETT Lachlan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
45 | HENDERSON Louis | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
46 | FOUX Jonathan | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
47 | NARAYAN Rishi | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
48 | TANJGA Luka | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
49 | BURENKOV Matthew | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
50 | BROOKS Drake | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
51 | ZALETAEV Jacob | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
52 | OREN Daniel | 7% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | |
53 | CHEN Vince | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
54 | TAYCHER Aaron | - | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
55 | LEIGH Brayden | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
56 | MAKLIN David | 13% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
57 | HUANG Lucas | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
58 | KOREN David | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
59 | LI kevin | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | BAKER Alexander | < 1% | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
61 | MENZIES Liam | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
62 | PATEL Kiran | 18% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
63 | KULKARNI Ishir | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
64 | HOWARTH Hayes | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
65 | LI Liam | 3% | 22% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.