NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 44% | |
| 2 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | YU Jane | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 19% | |
| 3 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 33% | |
| 5 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% |
| 6 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | 1% | 10% | 51% | 38% | |
| 7 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 1% | 15% | 46% | 38% | |
| 8 | FENG Audrey | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 32% | 7% | |
| 9 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 75% |
| 10 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 39% | 6% |
| 11 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 54% | 11% |
| 12 | SHENG Chuxi | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 13 | HAO Danica | - | - | 2% | 20% | 51% | 27% | |
| 14 | FIELD Julianna | - | - | 1% | 14% | 54% | 30% | |
| 15 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | - | - | 7% | 43% | 50% | |
| 16 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | - | 9% | 48% | 43% | |
| 17 | WANG Carol | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
| 18 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 19 | BRAVO ORTEGA Astrid | - | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 20 | HARRIS Julia | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 21 | WANG Dina C. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
| 22 | BERGEL Daphne | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 32% | 4% |
| 23 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% |
| 24 | XIE Lillian | - | - | 2% | 23% | 49% | 25% | |
| 25 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | 7% | 39% | 44% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 4% | 26% | 47% | 23% | |
| 27 | KIM Claire | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 10% | - |
| 28 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 29 | KRAHE Annika | - | 10% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | BING Charlotte | - | 1% | 10% | 46% | 36% | 7% | |
| 31 | LI Savannah | - | 9% | 45% | 39% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | SHANG Arianna | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | CHUNG Stella | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | ROBERTS Anastasia | 2% | 20% | 57% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 36 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 37 | GREENLEAF Ella | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MANGLANI Maya | 2% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | ORRINGER Lottie | 2% | 17% | 48% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 2% | 18% | 50% | 26% | 4% | |
| 41 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 6% | 43% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 43 | CAVANAGH Emma | 30% | 52% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | BERTOLINI Mia | 9% | 35% | 42% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda | 45% | 47% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | 5% | 36% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | BRODY Coco | 35% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | BAULIN Zoya | 17% | 45% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
| 49 | GOMEZ Sofia | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | GUPTA-NWANZE Nisa | 72% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | LAZAR Carolina | 4% | 45% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | CHOI Cara | 35% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | PANNONE Elisa | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | TOROPOVA Arina | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | ARRAIANO Olivia R. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | LIU Phydena | 21% | 51% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | BELISTRI Isabella | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 58 | JIANG Doris | 24% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | SHICK Veronika | 8% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | SFINTESCU Emma | 44% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | YONG Ellie | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 63 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 54% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.