Woodling Gymnasium - Cleveland, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | NDJEKA Jesse | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V V D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 3 | HUTTO Joshua | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | MASON Alexander T. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 6 | ZHANG James | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 7 | POHL Merik A. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 8 | STEELE DeMario A. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | HERDMAN Julian | V V D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 5 | +3.3 |
| 10 | JONES Reilly | D V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | LINDOW Connor | D V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 12 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | CAMP Ethan | D D V V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 14 | BOGARD Matt J. | V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 15 | APANASEWICZ Ethan | D D V V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 16 | MCDONNELL Michael | D V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | WILKINSON Derek H. | D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 18 | ZHANG Michael | D V D D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 19 | WANG Kaiyan | V V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 20 | SHELVEN Jr. Lawrence E. | V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 21 | KLINE R. Jay | V D D V D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 22 | LIU Quincy | D D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 23 | MCCOY Lauren | D D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 24 | CHOI Yunwoo | V D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 25 | RIVERA Ricky N. | V D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | MIHILL Margaret | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | SCHULTZ Gillian | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 28 | WILKINSON Heather E. | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 29 | POHL Mark S. | V D D D D D | D | 4.1 | 1 | -3.1 |
| 30 | JOBE Connor | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 31 | APANASEWICZ Dan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 32 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | TURZILLO Mary A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.