Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIONG Haojiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
| 2 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% |
| 3 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 5 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 6 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 7 | GUZMAN Mariana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 8 | YUEN Nicole | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 9 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 2% |
| 10 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% |
| 11 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 12 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% |
| 13 | GAY Sasha | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 4% |
| 15 | ZHAI Amy | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 19 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
| 20 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 21 | OCA Merci | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 22 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 23 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 24 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 25 | LO Chloe | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 28 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | STONE Coral | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 32 | NING Lynn | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | HU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | CAYRAT Roxane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
| 35 | BROCK Sydney | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 36 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 37 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | KIM Satie | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | LIN Abbey | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | YAM Danika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 41 | WONG Natalie | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | TEYSSIER Katherine | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 45 | LEE Lauren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 46 | MATSUO Kei | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 47 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 48 | NAVARRO LARIOS KATE | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIU Hannah | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | LOMOTAN Addison | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 51 | GUTIERREZ Adylia-Rhenee | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | LIU kai yin aria | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | NAKA Emily | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | HENRY Erin | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.