Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
| 2 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 3 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% |
| 3 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 5 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 6 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 7 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 8 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 10% |
| 9 | RUSSELL Renata | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 11 | WOLF Isabella A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 12 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 13 | KWON Athina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 14 | YOUNG Ashley | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 16 | BARNES Olivia R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 18 | LEE Olive | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 21 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 22 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 24 | JIN Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 25 | DINGMAN Amanda | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | QURESHI Aafreen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 28 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 30 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | WILLIAMS Sarah | 100% | 99% | 84% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 32 | ERTAS Eileen | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | GERARDIN Marie | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 35 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 36 | BONDAR Nika | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | DHILLON Ria | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 39 | TSANG JAFFE Avi | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | STRATTON Alexia | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 41 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | UPPALAPATI Sriya | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 43 | BECCHINA Olivia | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | HUANG audrey | 100% | 83% | 47% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | BRYANT Michelle | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | DU Angela | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | YU Bailey | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.