Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MELNYCHUK Yelyzaveta | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 2 | SHI Julia | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 3 | HU Anna | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | WANG yining | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 5 | COLTER Aurora | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 6 | WITEK Sophie B. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 40% | 52% |
| 7 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% | |
| 8 | WU Yuwei | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 9 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 52% | 22% |
| 10 | LI Sonia | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | < 1% |
| 11 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 5% |
| 12 | BARROSO Isabela | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 13 | FUNG Iris | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | CROOKS Riley | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 15 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 16 | FAVO Isabella | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 17 | MARYASH Samantha | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 18 | HASSAN Aziza R. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 42% |
| 19 | HUANG Rachael | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | SPEARS Mya B | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 21 | TENG EMMA | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | KHOST Maeve | 2% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | KHAN Alissa | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 25 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 26 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 27 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | GENTILE Vittoria | 1% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ZHENG Valentina | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 30 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | PRESANTH Nandana | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | MAK Kaitlin | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | CHI Claire | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 35 | LIU Kelly | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LEE Kaitlin | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | NEUMAN Ella | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | LIANG Claire | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | WONG Charlene | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | BARNES Sarah | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | GETZONI Mary | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.