Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 2 | ADLER Polly Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 3 | YAROSHENKO Karina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 3 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
| 5 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
| 6 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 7 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 8 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
| 9 | LUONG Paige K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
| 10 | LEE Annora Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 11 | LAU Sydnee M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 12 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 13 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 6% |
| 14 | HUNT Tarleton Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 15 | CHENG Lydia A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 16 | KANG Yuna | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 18 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 19 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% | |
| 20 | CHOI Lenna K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
| 21 | CHON Samantha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 22 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 23 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 18% |
| 24 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 25 | YANKOVSKIY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 26 | ZAROFF Roxanne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 27 | CROMPTON Celia N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 28 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | CHUSID Renata (Renata Chusid) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 30 | LEVI Lea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 31 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | TAN Delphine | 100% | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 34 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 6% |
| 37 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 37 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 39 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 40 | KALOPER Sofia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 41 | LU Tiffany J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 42 | CHEN Nicole Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 43 | YU Seneca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
| 44 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% |
| 45 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 46 | LAU Chloe M. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 47 | LUONG Joanne K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 48 | GOMES Rafaella T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 50 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% |
| 51 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 2% |
| 52 | BRADFORD Meeah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 53 | ZHANG Sylvia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
| 54 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | KIM Kayla A. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 57 | ALTEN Ayaka | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 58 | LEE Paulina | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 59 | DING Abigail | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 62 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 63 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 65 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
| 66 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
| 67 | TONG Ophelia | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 68 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 99% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 69 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 100% | 90% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 71 | IBEN Claire L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 8% |
| 72 | RAMAN Tanvi | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 72 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 74 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 75 | SUH Kailey E. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 76 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 97% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | TAKAGI Hikaru G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 78 | WU Kyra | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 79 | CHEN Cynthia | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 80 | DE LA CRUZ Alyssa | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 81 | ALFONSO Czarina M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
| 82 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 84 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 85 | HAUK Zsofia F. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 86 | FAN Elaine | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 87 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 88 | BHANOT Gayatri | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 89 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
| 90 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 91 | NAM Cassie | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 92 | TRAN Ava D. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 92 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 94 | POWERS Reilly K. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 95 | YEH Samantha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 96 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 97 | JING Emily | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 98 | CHON Sydney | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 99 | DE LA CRUZ Ava | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 100 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 101 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 102 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 103 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | YANG Blanche | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 100% | 96% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | WU Renee | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 107 | SU Alysa J. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 108 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | YOUNG Audrey S. | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 110 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 111 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 112 | CHEN Shiuan-An Shannon | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 113 | JACINTO JENNA R. | 100% | 74% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 114 | LAI Annika | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 114 | SCHWARTZMAN Salma | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 114 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 117 | YIN Helen | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 119 | FUNG Carina W. | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 120 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 121 | DHILLON Amani | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 122 | VENFORD Annetta S. | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.