Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 2 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 3 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | LIU Kelly | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 6 | TENG EMMA | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 7 | NEDOPAKA Kateryna | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 8 | HU Anna | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 9 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 10 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 11 | WU Yuwei | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 12 | SUVOROVA Anna | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 13 | PROBASCO Leila | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | LI Sonia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
| 15 | AWAD Royce | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | KWON Ava | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 17 | FAVO Isabella | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 18 | MACKAY Katherine | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | LAFFY Lily | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LEOU Korina | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
| 21 | XU Elaine | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 22 | FUNG Iris | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 23 | SPEARS Mya B | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 35% | 6% |
| 24 | CHOI Charlotte | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | SHI Julia | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 26 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 28 | TA-ZHOU Emma | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 29 | ZHANG Ashley | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 30 | CROOKS Riley | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 31 | BAIK Sarah | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | REN Katherine | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 33 | CHI Claire | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 34 | GONG Joy | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 35 | LEE Alyson | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 37 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | HUANG Pierra | 3% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
| 40 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 41 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 42 | KIM isabel | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | LIM Alexa J. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | BERRIOS Catalina | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | HUANG Rachael | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 46 | KHOST Maeve | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 47 | PRESANTH Nandana | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 48 | VATS Ishita | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | LIANG Claire | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | MAK Kaitlin | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 51 | WONG Charlene | 1% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | NG Sophia | 6% | 39% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | WANG JiaQi | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 54 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | - | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 55 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 56 | MYAT Chloe | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 57 | BANDHU Saahiti | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | BARNES Sarah | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | PARK Haylie | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 60 | EJIOGU Adaugo | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 61 | KIM Audrey | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 62 | KESSLER Amelia | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | MAK Jayden | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | SHI Chuqing | 8% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | NANDA Maanika | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 67 | CHAN Isla | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 68 | MARGULIS Roxana | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | HO Sophia | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 70 | GUHA Surabhi | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 71 | YEUNG Sidney | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 72 | PARK Lauren | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | CHIANG Madison | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LEE Kaitlin | 2% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 75 | LAU Teagan | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 76 | LEUNG Ella | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 77 | YUN Madison | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 77 | LIN Laura | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 79 | LAI Kaitlyn | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 80 | PATEL Sia Patel | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.