Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HEATHCOCK Colin | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | DENNER Lysander H. | V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | HARLEY Colby A. | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | ZHOU Matthew R. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 6 | CHANG Brandon | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | KIM Sean G. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | KIM Minwook | V V V D D | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 9 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 10 | BROWNE JR ROLSTON D. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 11 | JEFFORDS Alexander | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 13 | YOUNG Nash | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 14 | NOBLE Daniel | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | GINIS Nathan | D D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | DENNER Maximilian P. | D V D D V | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 17 | KIM Andrew H. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 18 | HONG Marshall Q. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 19 | DHINGRA Gian K. | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | CHO Brandon | V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 21 | LE Hayden | V D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 22 | DILLREE Spencer S. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 23 | CHAN Matthew | V D D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 24 | NG Jonathan H. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 25 | YANG Ziyi | V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 26 | MICHNA Colin P. | D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | TANG Alex Y. | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 28 | FLORES Peter D. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | HJERPE Wade H. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 30 | LIU Kelly | D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 31 | BARBER William S. | V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 32 | BERGER Oliver | D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 33 | CHEN Lucas B. | D V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 34 | CHENNURU Nischal | V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 35 | RAI Avin | V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 36 | TANN Justin | D V V D V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 37 | LEITH Jack | D V V D D V | D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
| 38 | WANG Eric Y. | D D D V V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 39 | KAYDALIN Artyom | D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 40 | ALKIN Isaac | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 41 | JINICH Ilan R. | V D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 42 | HOUTZ Jackson | D V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 43 | REYES Xavier M. | V D D D D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 44 | BAILEY Asher | V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 45 | GREEN IV James (Bud) | D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 46 | XU William | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 47 | LEUNG Nathan | D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 48 | HASNAH Henry | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | UEYAMA Ietetsu A. | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 50 | REED Samuel J. | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 51 | VO Minh Q. | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 52 | SEAL Maximus R. | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 53 | GAFFNEY John M. | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 54 | KORINTH Alexander J. | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 55 | PROCHAZKA Archer R. | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 56 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 57 | LIKER Maxim J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 57 | WANG Aragorn | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.