Johns Creek, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG Ziqiao Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | PATIL Amulya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | DANDRIDGE Laila Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | DONGES Anna | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 5 | CHENG Emma Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | HAMBRICK Addison | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | BEASLEY Rhealyn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | CLOPPER Meredith Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | WHALEY Juliette Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | RAFFERTY Catherine | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | MADRIGAL Katherine Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | ADAMS Eva Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | HUFF Arianna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | BASKIN Julia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | VICK Tristan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | POON Heidi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | HONG Elizabeth Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | HUFF Abigail Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | WONG Priscilla Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | NAILING Panamya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | ARMSTRONG Amberly Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | CHANDA Samyuktha Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | HOUSMANS Emma Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | MENDEZ Samantha Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | POON Holly Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | DANG Aivy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | MITCHELL Phara Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | CHHABRA Isharya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | LEE Lucy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | SIEGEL Gabrielle Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | FLYNN Bridget Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | CHENG Emily Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | NAVIN Elizabeth Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | YAU Katie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | SHRESTHA Somie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | DAS Mahika Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | HOOD Alex Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | BUFORD Kinley Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | HERNANDEZ Sadie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | SAMASSA Saffiatou Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | LYNCH Genevieve Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | GULER Zeynep Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | NAVEEN Sana Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | TOMIC Lana Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | VARUGHESE Jesme Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | ABBOTT Emily Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | PEEK Lailaa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | HOOVER Anna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | UPADHYAYA Ariya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | MATHUR Dhriti Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | AHMAD Fatima Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | MOTSI Fadzi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | LEE Daubin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 54 | RAVULA Neha Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | RAFFERTY Claire Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | WEST Elena Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | JONES Katriel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | WALKER Kacey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | SHANKAR Reema Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | YOUDELMAN Ella Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | APEMEKOU Gabriella Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 62 | YUSSOUFF Aseela Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 63 | ALI Maleeka Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 64 | GRIGG Khloe Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 65 | REDMOND Margaret Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 66 | JADHAV Aditi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | HALLIDAY Dezzalynne Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 68 | LU Karina Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 69 | ZWEIFEL Evelyn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 70 | MILLER Arya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 71 | CHOI Yuna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 72 | NAREDDY Tejaswi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 73 | KEDME Sarah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 73 | SAHIJRAM Samaya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 75 | TAYMAZ Arya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.